NSW Credit Law

Office Address

Suite 1 15 Liamina Avenue, Woonona NSW 2517
Phone: 02 4206 8951

Social Media

Opening hours / Monday – Friday / 9:00am to 5:00pm

0429 008 247
Image Alt

Why is it Harder to Obtain Credit in Australia?

Articles

Why is it Harder to Obtain Credit in Australia?

Why is it Harder to Obtain Credit in Australia?

 

  • Have you struggled to obtain credit in Australia recently and are unsure why?
  • What have been the recent developments in Australian Credit Law?
  • What should small to medium (SM) business owners and credit providers consider when providing credit in the current climate?

Obtaining credit in Australia can be more challenging due to economic conditions, regulatory frameworks, and individual creditworthiness. Still, in recent years, there have been developments in Australian Credit Law (ACL) which require lenders to be more responsible when providing credit:

 

  1. Regulatory Environment: Australia has strict lending regulations to promote responsible lending. Lenders must ensure that borrowers can afford the loans they are applying for, which can lead to more stringent approval processes.

 

  1. Credit Reporting: The credit reporting system in Australia is comprehensive. Lenders have access to detailed credit histories, meaning that a lower credit score or negative entries can significantly impact an individual’s ability to secure credit.

 

  1. Interest Rates: Interest rates play a role in credit availability. Higher interest rates can lead to increased costs for borrowers, deterring individuals from applying for loans. Additionally, lenders may tighten their lending criteria when interest rates rise to mitigate risk.

 

  1. Economic Conditions: Lenders may become more cautious during economic uncertainty or downturns, leading to stricter credit assessments. This can include more rigorous assessments of employment stability and income levels.

 

  1. Debt-to-Income Ratios: Lenders often consider a borrower’s debt-to-income ratio when assessing credit applications. If individuals already have debts, they may find it harder to qualify for additional credit.

 

Recent Developments in ACL

 

The recent developments in ACL have focused on regulatory reforms to enhance consumer protection and improve the lending process. The Australian government and regulatory bodies, such as the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), have been working on measures to address issues like responsible lending, transparency in fees, and the impact of buy-now-pay-later schemes.

 

One significant change has been the introduction of stricter regulations around responsible lending obligations, especially in the context of consumer credit. Additionally, there has been ongoing discussion about regulating fintech companies and how they fit into the existing credit framework.

 

In recent years, ACL has undergone significant scrutiny and reform, particularly following the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation, and Financial Services Industry, which concluded in early 2019.

 

The critical areas of focus and development:

 

  1. Responsible Lending: The National Consumer Credit Protection Act (NCCP) establishes responsible lending obligations, meaning lenders must assess whether a loan suits a borrower’s financial situation. Recent discussions have revolved around the balance between facilitating access to credit and ensuring consumer protection.

 

  1. Buy-Now-Pay-Later (BNPL): The popularity of BNPL services has led to calls for stronger regulations. Regulatory bodies have proposed that BNPL providers be subject to the same licensing and responsible lending obligations as traditional credit providers to protect consumers from potential default.

 

  1. Financial Hardship Provisions: There have been moves to enhance protections for consumers experiencing financial hardship, ensuring that lenders provide appropriate support and options for those struggling to meet repayments. There has been a particular focus on domestic violence and elder abuse.
  2. Increased Transparency: New requirements aim to improve the transparency of fees, charges, and the terms of credit contracts. This ensures that consumers fully understand the costs associated with borrowing.

 

  1. Regulatory Oversight: the regulatory bodies have been granted enhanced powers to regulate and enforce compliance within the credit industry. This includes the ability to impose penalties for non-compliance and to act against misleading conduct.

 

  1. Consumer Data Rights: The introduction of consumer data rights has allowed consumers more control over their financial data, enabling them to make informed decisions and switch providers more easily.

 

  1. Emerging Technologies: The rise of fintech companies has prompted discussions on integrating these new players into the existing regulatory framework without stifling innovation.

 

These developments reflect a broader trend toward ensuring credit markets operate fairly and transparently while providing adequate consumer protection. However, this has resulted in many Australians being refused credit in situations where previously they may have been approved.

 

SM Business Owners and Credit Providers Should be Engaging in More Responsible Lending

 

The main differences between the current responsible lending practices and traditional historical lending practices can be summarised as follows:

 

  1. Assessment of Borrower’s Ability to Repay:

– Responsible Lending: Credit providers should thoroughly assess a borrower’s financial situation, including income, expenses, and debts. They must ensure that the loan is suitable for the borrower.

Traditional Lending: While traditional lenders may historically have assessed a borrower’s creditworthiness, their priority was the business’s profitability and cash flow, with less emphasis on the borrower’s current financial capacity.

 

  1. Consumer Protection:

– Responsible Lending: Emphasises consumer protection by requiring credit providers to prioritise the borrower’s needs and circumstances, preventing them from being offered loans that could lead to financial hardship.

– Traditional Lending: Did not have such stringent protection measures in place, potentially allowing borrowers to take on loans beyond their means without adequate safeguards.

 

  1. Regulatory Framework:

– Responsible Lending: Governed by specific regulations, such as the National Consumer Credit Protection Act in Australia, which mandates compliance with responsible lending obligations.

– Traditional Lending: Operated under less stringent regulations, focusing on profitability and risk assessment rather than responsibility considering consumer outcomes.

 

  1. Transparency:

– Responsible Lending: Requires clear communication of loan terms, fees, and charges. Credit providers must provide comprehensive information to help borrowers make informed decisions.

– Traditional Lending: Transparency varied according to lending practices, and borrowers may not have received complete information about the costs and implications of the loan.

 

  1. Flexibility in Loan Terms:

– Responsible Lending: Encourages credit providers to offer flexible repayment options and terms that suit the borrower’s financial situation, promoting long-term financial health.

– Traditional Lending: May have offered fixed loan terms and conditions that did not account for changes in the borrower’s circumstances, potentially leading to difficulties in repayment.

 

  1. Focus on Financial Education:

– Responsible Lending: Often includes educating borrowers about their financial options and the implications of taking on debt, aiming to empower consumers.

– Traditional Lending: May not have prioritised borrower education, focusing instead on the transaction and approval process.

 

Responsible lending practices aim to create a more consumer-centric approach to lending, ensuring that borrowers are treated fairly and not placed in situations that could lead to financial distress. Traditional lending practices are now outdated and put a greater emphasis on credit risk management and profitability, sometimes at the expense of borrower well-being.

 

When you are next considering applying for credit, consider the recent changes to ACL as outlined above and conduct your own credit audit before entering any applications. Unsuccessful applications can further damage a consumer’s ability to obtain credit in this difficult financial climate.

 

If you are an SM business or a credit provider, it is essential that you review your credit worthiness assessment procedures to ensure that you have the most up-to-date protections in place to protect your business and the rights of consumers or small businesses.

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer: When researching and drafting this article we may use an AI advanced language model amongst other sources. It is intended for general informational purposes and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information provided, we cannot guarantee its completeness, timeliness, or appropriateness for any particular purpose. Usage of this information is at the reader’s own risk. We are not liable for any errors, omissions, or results that may be obtained from the use of this information. Always consult with a qualified professional before making any decisions based on the content of this article. For legal advice please contact Paul Thorndike on 0429 008 247 or at paulthorndike@nswcreditlaw.com.au

0
Skip to content